:: HealthNet’s Benefit Denial Based Upon Lack Of Medical Necessity Rejected

he district court concluded that a remand was futile because the Wieners did not show that Jonathan was eligible for GHT under the standards described in IPRO’s decision, which the parties call “the FDA standard.” It is unclear whether the FDA standard defines what is “medically necessary” under the policy. The policy provides, inter alia, …

:: HealthNet’s Benefit Denial Based Upon Lack Of Medical Necessity Rejected Read More »